This bill would amend section 232 of the "trade expansion act" that would require the president to submit proposed tariffs in the interest of national security to Congress for approval.
The Trump administration has used the obsolete law to unilaterally impose additional tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, drawing strong opposition from the domestic business community and US trading partners.
They said an effort led by Sen.
That review process would take 60 days and would include a debate and a vote on the floors of Congress. The bill has only recently been announced and it is not yet clear how this would affect the president politically.
And Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of SC told reporters that he would "advise everybody from the president to the people operating the elevator: don't obstruct justice". Senate Republicans say they don't need to think about Corker's invoice proper now as a result of they don't need to tie his palms in the course of these present talks, even when they assume Trump is utilizing the nationwide safety justification too liberally. This law has been used for a long time; it's never been used this aggressively.
However not all of his convention agrees. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said that the bill "appears to be a limited, reasonable response" because it would only be for tariffs related to national security concerns. "In general, these kinds of tariffs are a big mistake, and using national security as an excuse is a bigger mistake". Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross argued this morning that the new deal is even more effective than the original one, but many lawmakers disagree. "Hopefully, there's an opportunity in course on that", Rubio informed ABC.